Glaucon's Challenge: The Ring of Gyges
Thrasymachus has been silenced, but Glaucon (Plato's brother) is not satisfied. He wants Socrates to prove justice is good "in itself" - not for reputation, rewards, or consequences. To sharpen the challenge, Glaucon presents Thrasymachus's view in its strongest form. He tells the story of Gyges, a shepherd who found a ring of invisibility. With this power, Gyges seduced the queen, killed the king, and took the throne. Glaucon argues anyone would do the same if they could escape consequences. He then proposes a thought experiment: imagine two lives - the perfectly unjust man with a perfect reputation for justice, and the perfectly just man believed by all to be wicked. The unjust man has wealth, honor, power; the just man is tortured and executed. Which life is truly better? Socrates must prove the tortured just man is happier.
The Text
What You'll Learn
Comprehension
Explains Glaucon's demand: prove justice is good in itself, not for rewards or reputation
Cause & Consequence
Explains why Glaucon strips away rewards: to isolate justice itself from external goods
Meaning
Takes a position on whether the tortured just man is happier than the flourishing tyrant
Evidence
Cites a specific passage from Glaucon's speech
Defense
Maintains or thoughtfully revises position under challenge
Craft
Analyzes why Plato has Glaucon (not an enemy) present the challenge: a friendly devil's advocate
How It Works
Your AI tutor will guide you through this text using the Socratic method. Instead of giving you answers, it asks questions that help you discover the meaning for yourself.
- 1.Read the text carefully
- 2.Answer the tutor's questions in your own words
- 3.Progress through each stage as you demonstrate understanding
Free to try. No credit card required.