Thucydides' Method
Thucydides explains how he wrote his history differently from poets and chroniclers before him. He criticizes those who accept "the first story that comes to hand" and dismisses both poets (who exaggerate) and chroniclers (who sacrifice truth for entertainment). He explains his method: testing evidence rigorously, not trusting even his own impressions, and accepting that different eyewitnesses disagree. He admits that for speeches, he reconstructed what speakers "ought to have said." His famous conclusion: "The absence of romance in my history will, I fear, detract somewhat from its interest; but if it be judged useful by those inquirers who desire an exact knowledge of the past as an aid to the interpretation of the future... I shall be content. In fine, I have written my work, not as an essay which is to win the applause of the moment, but as a possession for all time."
The Text
What You'll Learn
Comprehension
Identifies that Thucydides criticizes poets for exaggeration
Cause & Consequence
Explains why Thucydides rejects myth and poetry as historical sources: time obscures truth, poets exaggerate
Meaning
Takes a position on whether Thucydides' approach is the right way to write history
Evidence
Cites a specific phrase or sentence from the passage
Defense
Maintains or thoughtfully revises their position under challenge
How It Works
Your AI tutor will guide you through this text using the Socratic method. Instead of giving you answers, it asks questions that help you discover the meaning for yourself.
- 1.Read the text carefully
- 2.Answer the tutor's questions in your own words
- 3.Progress through each stage as you demonstrate understanding
Free to try. No credit card required.