Thucydides: The Peloponnesian WarGrade 8dialectic Stage

Thucydides' Method

Thucydides explains how he wrote his history differently from poets and chroniclers before him. He criticizes those who accept "the first story that comes to hand" and dismisses both poets (who exaggerate) and chroniclers (who sacrifice truth for entertainment). He explains his method: testing evidence rigorously, not trusting even his own impressions, and accepting that different eyewitnesses disagree. He admits that for speeches, he reconstructed what speakers "ought to have said." His famous conclusion: "The absence of romance in my history will, I fear, detract somewhat from its interest; but if it be judged useful by those inquirers who desire an exact knowledge of the past as an aid to the interpretation of the future... I shall be content. In fine, I have written my work, not as an essay which is to win the applause of the moment, but as a possession for all time."

The Text

What You'll Learn

1

Comprehension

Identifies that Thucydides criticizes poets for exaggeration

2

Cause & Consequence

Explains why Thucydides rejects myth and poetry as historical sources: time obscures truth, poets exaggerate

3

Meaning

Takes a position on whether Thucydides' approach is the right way to write history

4

Evidence

Cites a specific phrase or sentence from the passage

5

Defense

Maintains or thoughtfully revises their position under challenge

How It Works

Your AI tutor will guide you through this text using the Socratic method. Instead of giving you answers, it asks questions that help you discover the meaning for yourself.

  • 1.Read the text carefully
  • 2.Answer the tutor's questions in your own words
  • 3.Progress through each stage as you demonstrate understanding
Start This Lesson

Free to try. No credit card required.